Friday, 31 August 2012




Harvard University probes largest mass cheating scandal



Kunwar Abhishek Bhagat, Delhi
(via- PTI)
 About 125 University undergraduates are being investigated for cheating in a final exam last year, the largest academic misconduct scandal in the prestigious institution's history. The Harvard College administrative board is reviewing the allegations of "academic dishonesty," ranging from "inappropriate collaboration to outright plagiarism, on a take-home final exam," dean of undergraduate education Jay Harris said in a note sent to students.

A comprehensive review of every exam from the class found that nearly half of the 279 enrolled students may have worked together in groups to develop and share answers. The students whose work is under review have been contacted by the board, which will meet with each student separately seeking to understand all the relevant facts and to determine whether any faculty rules were violated. Students found responsible of academic dishonesty could face disciplinary actions including withdrawal from the college for a year.

"We take academic integrity very seriously because it goes to the heart of our educational mission," said Michael Smith, dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, who sent a letter to the FAS faculty to outline actions the faculty can take to reinforce Harvard's academic policies. "Academic dishonesty cannot and will not be tolerated at Harvard."

While neither the course nor the name of students allegedly involved was revealed, Harvard Crimson, the university's student newspaper, said the students were enrolled in the 'Introduction to Congress' class taught by assistant professor Matthew Platt. "These allegations, if proven, represent totally unacceptable behavior that betrays the trust upon which intellectual inquiry at Harvard depends," said Harvard University president Drew Faust. "We must deal with this fairly and through a deliberative process. At the same time, the scope of the allegations suggests that there is work to be done to ensure that every student at Harvard understands and embraces the values that are fundamental to its community of scholars."

The allegations surfaced last semester when the faculty member teaching the course questioned the similarities between a number of exams and referred them to the board. After reviewing the exams and interviewing students who submitted them, representatives of the board initiated the broader review in consultation with the faculty member. The board has not come to any judgment about specific cases. Smith cautioned that the allegations should not lead people to draw broad conclusions. "We must also not forget that the vast majority of our students complete all their assignments honestly, diligently, and in accordance with our regulations and practices," Smith said.

"Allegations of inappropriate collaboration or plagiarism in a single class should not be allowed to diminish the good work or reputation of our outstanding student body." The administrative board is responsible for evaluating requests for exceptions to academic policies and review of students' academic performance.

Thursday, 30 August 2012

It’s all about Sports  vs. Academics

Should India’s World Cup winning captain be penalized for playing for his country?

Unmukt Chand with the World Cup


Kunwar Abhishek Bhagat
Dt. 30-08-2012, Delhi

India under 19 team captain Unmukt Chand denied for promotion in the Second year of his bachelor of Arts course by St. Stephen college, as he failed to accumulate the minimum attendance which is required by the college.

Indian Senior Team captain also tweeted that "Marks for sports take a back seat... attendance for now takes centre stage, This shows how much importance sports has in India... sad to hear."

Vice-president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Union Minister, Rajiv Shukla, said it was an internal matter of the college. He, however, appealed to St Stephen's authorities to consider Unmukt as a special case.

"I appeal to St Stephen's to take a considerate view on Unmukt. But I understand that it is an internal matter. The college is autonomous. But I am making this appeal," Shukla said.  

College principal Valsan Thampu defended his institution, saying that he is simply following the rules. He denied discrimination on part of the college management and added it was the Delhi University vice-chancellor's prerogative to decide whether or not to promote Unmukt despite his poor attendance.

Further, Thampu said Unmukt had attended only eight percent classes and as per rules his minimum attendance should have been at least one-third of the total classes.

Ironically, the young star was admitted to the college under the sports quota and his academic record has also been good. In May, he was not allowed to give his second semester exam until the Delhi High Court intervened. He eventually gave the exam and scored 62 per cent marks. His lawyer says the college was aware of the BCCI and DDCA schedules.

Unmukt had recently scored an unbeaten century in the under-19 World Cup final against Australia to lift the trophy for India.